“ Umm… I’m starting to see a pattern here.”
I just don’t see anything like that from official sources at the State, Federal or foreign Government level, or from other FReepers involved in providing care.
Isolated Twitter accounts lack credibility with me, unless they comport with both a sound theoretical explanation and independent, authoritative data.
I’m sure we could find accounts revealing powerful arguments for Bigfoot, UFOs and the Loch Ness Monster. They should be taken with a grain of salt.
The account you link uses extreme profanity (f@@k) frequently, which is atypical for highly educated, professional doctors, especially when discussing professional matters. It seizes on reckless assumptions (like probably only 1% is reported, so let’s multiply by 100), that a serious professional would avoid like a land mine. It presents conclusions that are radically in opposition to what is published in peer reviewed journals, or from official sources.
In short, it sounds like B.S. to me.
Prescient, comprehensive, and clearly written
For those who seek more nuanced understanding of ADE, as well as other aspects of what has been done to evaluate safety risk.
"Learning from the past: development of safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines"https://t.co/S73Odku0NH— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) August 20, 2021
Listen to this. She is on fire. One needs to realize that the case fatality rate among those less than 50 yo is miniscule. #boomerdisease https://t.co/EYVbaOl5yb— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) August 20, 2021