It took you this long to claim it. Something smells fishy.
So our disagreement is over the historicity of the bible. You claim there’s extrabiblical bullshiite that you like to include in your canon, and most christians are satisfied with the current canon, including the vast majority of historians.
You sound like a Christian SCIENCE Minister.
And the answer to your question, if you came to my church, would be no. You do not believe in the historicity of the bible nor the canon, it is likely you do not believe Jesus is God Himself. You argue dishonestly. It’s like pulling teeth. You’re pushing some anti-trinitarian agenda.
Something about the words, the style, the combativeness...just doesn’t ring true to me. But, that’s just my opinion, and I’m no minister or shrink.
“You’re pushing some anti-trinitarian agenda.”
Of course not, If anything I am pushing a CONSTITUTIONAL agenda. It isn’t always comfortable with what we personally might believe. But it is I hope what we all want word for word.
Don’t agree, don’t like it? Then push to amend it formally. I hope this is what we all want? And the Free Republic supports first and foremost I hope?
If we give religion the priority over all, it very well could soon be sharia law we are all bending down to.. Do not take this lightly. It is just around the corner.