To: bagster
Maybe, but why would he use shorthand when in other places he plainly used “no such agency” ? Everything has meaning. Misspellings have meaning, etc.
my take 2
165 posted on
08/15/2021 4:41:06 AM PDT by
Ymani Cricket
( "Pressure Makes Diamonds" ~General Patton)
To: Ymani Cricket
Maybe, but why would he use shorthand when in other places he plainly used “no such agency” ? Everything has meaning. Misspellings have meaning, etc. my take 2 WHAT NO SUCH AGENCY is grammatically incorrect. He's asking WHAT AGENCY. Answer: the NO-AGENCY. He knows we know that that means.
That's why the short-hand, in my opinion.
178 posted on
08/15/2021 5:00:40 AM PDT by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: Ymani Cricket; bagster
“No-agency”
A dash is added, and the word “such” is missing.
There may be a clue in what was added and what is missing.
190 posted on
08/15/2021 5:47:43 AM PDT by
WildHighlander57
((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000) )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson