Replies

But the portion of the Symposium that deal with the packet captures wasn’t for the benefit of Josh Merritt. It was for the CISSP (at a minimum) credentialed attendees that were there at the invitation of Mike Lindell to examine the packet captures that he claims showed the election results were changed.

Since you aren't a CISSP and you didn't attend the event, you have no standing to object to anything Lindell did. Nor are you a competent witness to testify about anything that happened there. BTW, I haven't read anything supporting your assertions either.

Come on now. Is that the right statement to make?

Yes.

At least two attendees stated they did not get to review any of the 2020 election packet captures.

Name them.

Asked another way - are there any attendees that claim they viewed and analyzed packet captures from the 2020 election as discussed by Mike Lindell prior to the Symposium?

Well, again, Josh Merritt obviously attended the event and analyzed Pcaps. The fact that the corporate media isn't reporting on what actually happened, doesn't prove it didn't happen.

Since you aren't a CISSP and you didn't attend the event, you have no standing to object to anything Lindell did. Nor are you a competent witness to testify about anything that happened there. BTW, I haven't read anything supporting your assertions either.

Unfortunately, that is intellectually dishonest. Whatever certifications a poster may or may not have is irrelevant.
Moreover, such declarations are an attempt to steer discussion away from the main points being discussed.
And my comments are based on what attendees are reporting and also by virtue of watching the Symposium. Also, Mike Lindell was no longer stating during the third day of the Symposium that cyber experts were reviewing packet captures provided to Lindell.

Name them.

Robert Graham
Harri Hursti
Bill Alderson

Well, again, Josh Merritt obviously attended the event and analyzed Pcaps. The fact that the corporate media isn't reporting on what actually happened, doesn't prove it didn't happen.

But media is reporting on what has happened. That it is not "corporate" media is not really relevant is it? Either the reporting is accurate or it is not. Here's some coverage from Wednesday:

https://www.dakotanewsnow.com/2021/08/12/cyber-expert-claims-mike-lindell-does-not-have-election-data-eligible-5-million-award/