I followed your link to see who the person was whom you cited as having the credentials to debunk this public person, and I could find no names behind the screen.
Do you have some knowledge of who this Skeptical Raptor is and why an anonymous source should be believed over a named source?
Second question, are you just debunking the doctor who wrote the article or the entire MIT-Harvard research team whose paper is cited by the article written by the doctor?
-PJ
Political Junkie Too wrote: “I followed your link to see who the person was whom you cited as having the credentials to debunk this public person, and I could find no names behind the screen.”
If you had read the article I linked you would have found two things.
First a technical discussion of why Corrigan is wrong.
Second a review of Corrigan’s credentials which are suspect.