Replies

My preface: Or maybe it wasn't time. A LOT of info DID get out. Stuff a lot of people had never seen or heard. To me, having been here doing and sharing and tag-teaming research, much of what was presented at the Symposium, especially on the day 1 intro (the summary) is info that consisted of research that can be found right here in the archives of this thread. We probably forgot more than they presented, so to speak. Thank you Ransomnote. #patriotshaveitall

It was like someone took all the research from Q related threads here and elsewhere and put it into one giant presentation (but with some extra stuff we hadn't seen yet). Forwarded from
TruthHammer
(TruthHammer888)
Fact: I am not the one who chose to make a huge deal about the PCAPS

👀 $5 mil was promised for anyone who can prove the PCAPS are false… and then nobody was allowed to see the PCAPS.

I want to know who set Lindell up. Many of you are not asking the right questions.

👀 $5 mil was promised for anyone who can prove the PCAPS are false… and then nobody was allowed to see the PCAPS.

I want to know who set Lindell up. Many of you are not asking the right questions.

Although I did not see all of the presentations from the 3 days cannot see any reference to PCAPS even being mentioned, much less covered?

I also assumed (perhaps erroneously) the the 5 mil challenge was for someone to prove the CPACS false yet no mention of them and no explanation as to why not?

CodeMonkeyZ hinted in the days prior to the symposium that there may be a problem with the CPAPS, still no explanation why?

If one ignores Mikes ramblings a lot of good information was presented in the three days but I'm left with 2 troublesome questions:

1. Mike told everyone, especially the media, to tune in at 7 PM the first night for a blockbuster announcement. Big build up to this. Then after being late to podium when he did show up no mention of the big announcement and no explanation as to why not? The AG in Col raided the Mesa election office as the election officals were in route, did this sidetrack his announcement? Why no explainations from Mike, not even a "But Wait"?

2. No mention of PCAPS? This appeared to be a big deal, showed China hacked the election, why was this not part of the symposium, and why no explanation as to this omission? Was the CPACS information Mike received fake of false? Was Mike told to stand down on further discussion of CPACS becausing of timing, waiting to the big reveal?