I wasn’t attempting to explain the others....take a pick, liberal, compromised, blackmail, etc. I was just wondering how Trump’s picks seem to have taken a turn to the dark side.
I can see where she would make that decision. There’s already a SC decision over 100 years ago saying states can require vaccinations of their citizens; the school is a state school. It’s a state issue, not a federal issue.
Barrett didn't act as a liberal, or compromised or blackmailed. In this case she acted as a true "Constitutionalist".
The USSC was asked to review the appeal's court denial of an emergency stay of the University's mandated vaccine. The appeals court based their decision on a previous USSC ruling that vaccines are a state issue (which they are, as are lockdowns, masks, etc).
Finding no issue with logic or use of prescedent, Barrett allowed the appeal's court decision to stand. This is how the USSC review process is supposed to work.
The plaintiffs are free to try a different track.