I am part of the Grassy Knoll conspiracy, the "GWB bombed the WTC on 9/11" conspiracy, the Black Helicopters conspiracy, and all the rest.
Funny you should mention 'the grassy knoll', since the term and over usage of it was put into effect by the CIA to tamp down any 'grassy knoll' theories. You can google that one.
Of course, your real brain knows that those so-called 'conspiracy theories' have nothing to do with this covid/vax conspiracy fact. But I guess you tossing them out in the same thought pattern as the poison vax hoax is sposed to make people think they're all equally whacky.
Is that your game, vax boy?
Hint: The answer is yes.
#ArentYouTheCleverLad
Well sorry to tell you, son. But it's obvious you weren't among my originally-intended audience.
I posted a long, fact-filled, well-thought-out argument, including math kept simple enough that even a grade-school dropout could follow :
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3980064/posts?page=213#213
It was intended for people who might be on the fence about the truth of the claim that: "Vaxes don't protect against ANYthing! See this Peer-Reviewed blahblah..."
I didn't expect any response from that group. I can only cross my fingers that facts and logic and simple math got through to some number of them, and they can now clearly see how they're being manipulated into visiting clickbait conspiracy links, via a statistic that has been cleverly twisted into a Big Lie.
By the positive responses I got, I know I was right on target.
And speaking of targets .... When the Cream of the Crap of Conspiracy Cretins pop up their pointy little heads to scream ad-hominems back at my long post, they make themselves targets too tempting for me to ignore. I gladly accomodate them by shifting into ultra-low gear == stooping down to their level to wrestle with them in their sties, getting glorious mud from their habitat all over myself.
And why not? By never mentioning any of the facts + stats + quotes I brought up, you have either chosen to completely ignore reasoning that destroys one of your favorite lies, or else you haven't the candle-power required to understand basic logic. Either case means it's pointless to attempt to engage with you on a rational level.
So yes, you can pat yourself on the back for finally realizing that I was employing "sarcasm"! (Wow, do ya think?)
Reasoned debate can be stimulating when it's with someone who is willing to concede some of your points, argue with others, and bring up new points supporting their contentions, and you do the same for them.
OTOH, it's only superficially and temporarily entertaining to wrestle with Porky or Petunia at their level, trading zing for zing, sarcasm for sarcasm, ad-hominem for ad-hominem.
And since that's all that's left of this discussion baggy, I bid you and norsky sayonara. I see you've already started playing with each other anyway, rolling around in it and gleefully squealing, so I trust you won't miss my presence. It looks like others are dropping out as well, holding their noses no doubt, so yet once again you can claim Victory! that you're the last ones still standing in your sty.
Over and Out.