Re: 186 - Really good research. Thanks for putting in the effort for the issue at hand.
My guess is his answer will be lame, with some excuse for why he can't simply give us a simple link to the actual original "peer-reviewed article in The Lancet" ... and why it instead has to be a "copy" or a "summary" or a "list of major take-aways" from that Lancet article and has to be hosted on a non-Lancet server.
If you google the URL he publishes, you'll find it only occurs in various FR postings from this same guy. Ie he's the only one quoting it, and nobody else (on the first 30 links anyway). So I suspect it's either that he gets ad revenue if you click on it, or else it's a carefully constructed Potemkin Village that hides far more truth than it reveals. I'm not going to click on his link. If there really truly is a Lancet article as he claims, then he can give us a link that looks like this: .... .thelancet.com/..... If he does, then the article exists and we can read it for ourselves. If he doesn't, then he can't find it because it doesn't really exist.