~~~~
If only it weren't a toxic brew of biowarfare propaganda, I might agree with you
Post-vaccination infections, or breakthroughs, might occasionally turn symptomatic, but they aren’t shameful or aberrant. They also aren’t proof that the shots are failing. These cases are, on average, gentler and less symptomatic; faster-resolving, with less virus lingering—and, it appears, less likely to pass the pathogen on. ...
Actually, this tragically false. The vaccinated are becoming ill more "quietly" at first, so they don't know to stay home and they go around spreading the illness. It's making those who are vaccinated "super spreaders".
Worse still, since the illness in the vaccinated starts 'too quietly", they don't know they need to start medications. Days go by as their illness deepens before they realize they are ill so it's not possible for them to get the most effective, early treatment. That's why they almost seem like the medications aren't helping or aren't effective - it's now given later in their illness than needed because of this 'quiet start.'
by your logic, asymptomatics were ‘becoming ill more quietly’ and risking their lives by delaying treatment.
Are you changing your position that asymptomatics were never a danger, were not sick and were not contageous and didn’t need masks?
As to ‘more medications’. India has reported that Delta is requiring higher dosing of ‘medications’ and they aren’t working as well as they did against the original wuhan version. That is a big problem, Houston. Especially for those who expect hospitals to replace vaccinations. Otoh, the vaccines designed for Wuhan Original Recipe seem to be holding their own with Delta, at least in adverting severe disease and death, try as it might to escape antibody and vaccine neutralization.