Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
They wouldn't be able to carry a paying cargo while Northern ships would be able to carry a paying cargo. This would put foreign ships at a severe disadvantage in the money making business.

Be it U.S. ship or foreign ship, once landing the imports in New York or Boston or Philadelphia they would still have to sail empty to a southern port to load up on cotton for the return trip to Europe. Foreign ships because they could not move cargo from one U.S. port to another even if their had been any, U.S. ships because what was there to take to the southern port?

850 posted on 08/19/2021 12:46:43 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 846 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg
Be it U.S. ship or foreign ship, once landing the imports in New York or Boston or Philadelphia they would still have to sail empty to a southern port to load up on cotton for the return trip to Europe.

They would under the navigation act of 1817, but they wouldn't in a seceded CSA.

Foreign ships because they could not move cargo from one U.S. port to another even if their had been any, U.S. ships because what was there to take to the southern port?

The market would sort itself out. The Northerners, not having the previous supply of money they used to have, would buy less, and the Southerners, having substantially more money than they did before, would buy more.

What would they buy? Dunno, but I do know they would buy stuff because what else would they do with the money?

888 posted on 08/23/2021 3:29:00 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 850 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson