I am afraid this dialectic has degraded into a humorless amateur exchange that is boring. Good night. He often tries to substitute snark for a valid argument. We can pity the fellow because he often cannot put forth a valid argument to support his claim, and is therefore left with no choice but to use snark.
What was that old Lawyer's saying?
If the law is on your side, pound the law.
If the facts are on your side, pound the facts.
If neither the facts nor the law are on your side, pound the table.
You haven't responded to my request, but I'll go and do it anyway. I will pay you a compliment. I will give you credit, at least, for maintaining a decent level of civility, and a willingness to engage in debate. I think you're wrong, you distort history, ignore evidence, evade the point in question, and commit other nefarious acts during the course of exchanges, but I will continue the dialogue as long as it goes on. On the other hand, I'll remind you that YOU dropped the first F bomb, so you might consider getting off your high horse for a moment.
Others are not so decent. Some are so ludicrous, so dedicated to trolling others, that snark is too good for them. These people don't like the taste of their own medicine. They deserve no further responses. They are non entities.