Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SoCal Pubbie
YOU said the FACT that England had a surplus of cotton in 1861 was bullshit. As I showed, shortages did not appear until late in 1862, and were short lived. Own it Dim.

Whatever. A year here, a year there, pretty soon you're talking about some real time.

Again, you're words. Now the implication of that is that Southern plantations would be at a HUGE competitive disadvantage if slavery was abolished.

Well yeah, and they would have been at a severe disadvantage if you burned all their homes and crops and murdered many hundred thousands of them, but what is your point? None of that would have happened without a war that Lincoln started to protect the money supply of his corrupt power barons of the North.

Slavery was *NOT* going to get abolished in a "preserved" Union.

Now, as you always say, follow the money.

Absolutely! Nothing was going to change so long as the Northern Mafia continued getting it's money from the South. What caused the war was the threat of cutting off the money going to the Wealthy men of the North.

626 posted on 08/14/2021 1:33:58 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 623 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

“Slavery was *NOT* going to get abolished in a “preserved” Union.”

You mean like in all the free Northern states?


630 posted on 08/14/2021 1:53:14 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson