Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

In this case, not so much. Charleston was in decline as a seaport long before the Civil War, as my source indicated. Or perhaps you knew that, but didn’t want to admit it.


533 posted on 08/10/2021 6:39:08 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies ]


To: SoCal Pubbie
In this case, not so much. Charleston was in decline as a seaport long before the Civil War, as my source indicated.

I have no doubt it was. Why would anyone need to use it? The import taxes there were the same as they were in New York, and it was 800 miles further south. Why would anyone go there?

Well let's say you could make 40% more profit going there. Would that change your mind? I think it would have done for most back in that era.

Or perhaps you knew that, but didn’t want to admit it.

More like I have no idea what you are trying to get at, or why you think the particular condition of Charleston is especially relevant.

Charleston wasn't much of a port prior to secession, but with secession, it would have become greatly more significant. 13% tax versus 45% tax is why Charleston would have taken business from the Northeast. New Orleans would have been the primary beneficiary, but other ports in the South would have benefited as well.

535 posted on 08/10/2021 8:22:37 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 533 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson