Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bull Snipe
nice recap except the premise of the 1817 navigation act being passed to boost Northern shipping is wrong. The act was passed in retaliation for the British barring American shipping from trading between with their Caribbean islands.

What it's "intentions" were when it was passed is irrelevant to what it's effects were in operation. Year after year we see these bozos up in Washington declaring they are passing some such thing for some such purpose, and invariably it ends up doing something else and which is much worse than we were led to believe.

Remember the "Patriot act"? How's that looking now?

Let's say I believe their intentions were good, but invariably any law is twisted by immoral players into something they can use as a tool or a weapon. The Navigation Act was no different.

508 posted on 08/09/2021 1:01:21 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

There were successful Southern shipping companies with the Navigation act in place. Had it not been for that law, the Southern shippers would have lost out entirely to the British shippers.


512 posted on 08/09/2021 1:32:55 PM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson