Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
The entire cotton trade ran on credit. The cotton factor house advanced money to the planter on the basis of an expected crop. That crop was the collateral. The factor sold the cotton to a broker in New York or a foreign buyer (the actual logistics of this gets complicated, as explained in Five Cotton States). At some point a foreign import/export house might ship a given value of manufactured goods on the promise of an equivalent value of cotton. No money changed hands.

Cotton was particularly suited for credit because unlike corn, sugar, or molasses the goods didn't go bad.

1,001 posted on 08/25/2021 12:23:32 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 998 | View Replies ]


To: SoCal Pubbie
At some point a foreign import/export house might ship a given value of manufactured goods on the promise of an equivalent value of cotton. No money changed hands. Cotton was particularly suited for credit because unlike corn, sugar, or molasses the goods didn't go bad.

What was wrong with money? The cotton exporter sells to sources in Britain. The British exporters sells to sources in New York. No need to barter.

1,002 posted on 08/25/2021 12:52:23 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1001 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson