“ We DO approve of discussion, and not chasing people possibly new to Q
away, and we have done more to bring truth to people, just by trying,
than you will ever admit.”
——————————————————————————————-
That’s a bunch of bull.
I spent 3 days of my life trying to convince people that Ashli Babbit was really shot based on my experience and expertise.
I spent 2 days trying to explain that the Asian man around Joe Biden was Secret Service, again based on my expertise.
Along the way someone’s feelings got hurt, they complained to to the Boss and he told me to stay off the Q Threads.
Which I respectfully have done.
So no, y’all don’t welcome people that don’t comply lock and step with the fantasy.
Take another look at who was attacking you on THOSE 2 points.
Who said you were wrong? Were folks simply debating or speculating?
Name names if you like.
(I’m Not interested in those who simply found you trollish, thank you.)
Although I was among those who found you trollish, I actually agree with
you on both of those two issues.
But there was a lot more to discuss about that than whether or not she was actually shot, like the lack of reaction by all the antifa derps and security
persons with her to the gunfire. As if their plan had just worked.
I know it’s tempting to think that all who post in the Q threads that post
questionable stuff and start fights are there with honest intentions, even
when misinformed, but that’s just not always the case.
I take my own notes and form my own opinions about who those folks
might be, but to avoid risking liable, I usually keep my own counsel.
The level of information warfare that takes place to attempt to marginalize
us there is occasionally quite sophisticated.
Can’t say if that happened or not in the particular case you site.
And I can’t even say if it was one of your secret buddies interacting with
you or not to cause all the distraction. Perhaps if you had not been so trollish it would have been easier to tell.