A missile that no one saw in real life...including two pilots and plane load of passengers on a commercial flight passing by, and an air rescue helicopter crew that was taking off at the exact moment the 'streak of light' was recorded on a time delay camera.
Also, you can see in the video that is a populated area, yet not one single person reported seeing a streak of light or any unusual noise.
As usual, the dopey Q-anons did ZERO research to corroborate this story, or question why a "rogue submarine" would choose the middle of a populated area to shoot a missile at Air Force One.
Unbiased, automated video imagery clearly confirms the missile claim in the most straightforward way. That evidence would be extremely difficult to manufacture artificially. Your anti-Occam's razor answer: It wasn't what it plainly seemed to be despite the alternate explanation's being built on of a house of cards.
You infer it was the responsibility of those who didn't see or hear anything to report same, to corroborate the suppositions of a non-event, as your low horsepower research has concluded. That they haven't made such report you claim to somehow strengthen your narrative.
From an alternate reality, you imply responsibility on the part of those whose responsibility it actually was to detect such a missile, to report it sufficiently publicly that your low horsepower research would have found it.
You claim the existence of what you deem to be a "rational explanation" should cast out all other explanations and evidence.
You fallaciously imply there could not be anyone who could successfully work to keep evidence of the missile from the public, e.g., the attempted murderers, the planners, operatives and cover-up artists, perhaps such as you may be.
You attempt to turn the absence of a number of people's awareness about the missile's existence into a responsibility of the anons, which, such that if they cannot find such persons willing and able to counter your report, you deem it your right to cast whatever they might otherwise claim into some "dopey" trash heap. Yes, "not one single person reported seeing [it]" except those that did. Gee, you're so convincing --NOT!
You're quite willing to lie to say anons "did ZERO research." When one has been shown to lie to the court, the jury is admonished that they may disregard every part of the liar's testimony. You are such a person.
Without evidence and in Leftist fashion, you attempt to ridicule a large number of people who have done much credible research, as nonetheless "dopey." Many Freepers such vacuous rationalizations.
Sorry, bub, that and a $1.25 might get you a McDonalds cup of coffee.