You would suspect correctly. You made a claim previously and the first paragraph of your post explains why you can’t provide information to substantiate your claim. In other words, you were jackassin’ (see Grapes of Wrath, Pa Joad speaking to the ragged man for a definition of that term).
As to the rest of your post - good luck to ‘ya.
"Come on, folks. Grow up. Knock off the name calling and insults.Act like adults. Doing otherwise just leads to a poor Signal-to-Noise ratio and the thread quality degrades as well".
#HypocriteMuch
You seem to be a derisive sort, who doesn’t bring anything good or useful to the party. That I think I “suspect correctly,” too.
I’m content that people here might read your comments and mine and come to their own conclusions about who goes after supporting evidence and deals more forthrightly with facts and reasoning.
Don’t let the screen door door hit ya where the Good Lord split ya! (...which is to say, “Bye!”)