Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: norsky
They have a high false negative result, so pretty much useless

whoops, meant false positives.

45 posted on 07/17/2021 4:27:08 PM PDT by norsky (<a href=></a> <img src=""></img>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: norsky

47 posted on 07/17/2021 4:37:29 PM PDT by norsky (<a href=></a> <img src=""></img>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: norsky

Yes. You make a good point.

I am a biochemist, and Fuellmich DOES make a lot of sense.

The only thing he seems not to fully understand is that a biological method of analysis (specifically, the PCR test for COVID-19) can be set up to maximize sensitivity (i.e., to detect as many positive cases as possible), OR it can be set up to maximize specificity (i.e., to avoid as many false positives as possible). But one cannot simultaneously maximize BOTH sensitivity AND specificity.

So, a sensitive PCR test is NOT some kind of evil plot: its high false positive rate is inevitable for a maximally sensitive test.


95 posted on 07/18/2021 3:53:28 PM PDT by cygnet (Not by might, not by power, but by My Spirit ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson