Posted on 07/17/2021 2:54:14 PM PDT by norsky
I had a similar reaction after watching.
Just sickening how they show a total lack of regard for the horrendous damage they have done.
They literally attacked every single man, woman, and child in the USA and the entire world.
Interview with Dr. Martin is linked at post 6. FYI
Crimes against humanity. A Nuremberg 2, as Dr. Fuellmich brings up, is likely what is needed.
I saw that too on another thread. Like you I can’t say if it is true.
Looks like the CCDH is gonna have to put Dr. Reiner Fuellmich on its list too.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3976974/posts
Yup. My sister, who is in a rest home, had it and showed no symptoms at all. 82 years old.
Yet they had to shut the dam thing down, and lock them all in their rooms like criminals. I went nuts on them there. I said, “What the hell you all think your going to accomplish?” “They all got it so you failed.” “Open it up for visiting.”
Nope, had to keep them in solitary confinement like criminals. They had plenty of space to do that without risking “infection” to the rest home population WHO ALREADY HAD IT!
That is why I believe, and a whole lot of those like us, that it was an exercise in martial law.
Like an Agenda for 2021. An Agenda21 if you will...
BTW Jane. My brother got in in December who was in the latter stages of liver failure. He survived it and it effected him very little.
His sone and his wife got it. It effected his wife pretty bad and she spent some time in the ICU. My nephew got over it without much trouble. Good friend of mine got it last Nov 15th and although he had FOUR tests done at the local hospital, all negative, he went to Green Bay WI and they tested him positive and it was the last thing he remembered for 16 days. They told him there after when they discharged him that if he had come in at the first sign, he would have spent very little time in that place.
So it depended on the individual.
What they did, to the elderly in nursing homes, was criminal.
Whether purposely infecting them (cough, cough, Cuomo), or keeping them from seeing their loved ones....the ONE thing these people need, more than anything at this stage in their lives....should make all responsible, for these horrid decisions, to be brought up on charges.
Mistakes? Seems more like a plan.
It IS a plan, as we all know.
However, in the vid, Fuellmich explains not only their ‘plan’, but, how in their haste (in moving it up, from 2050, then to 2030, to 2020) they got sloppy and made mistakes that will be their own demise.....hopefully!
They wanted to kill off those in the nursing homes.
Cant have all those republicans voting you see..
These are perhaps the exceptions.
Fuellmich is already famous and wealthy. They have thousands of scientists, whistleblowers, physicians, as well. The interviews have been consistent for months and transparent.
The single response from the DS has been:”No country ever _signed_ the Nuremburg Accords.” (I have seen one faux outraged D who said there was no comparison between today and the Nazi experiments. He did not seem to get a lot of traction.) Apologists seem to burst upon the scene too early and are then forced into silent retreat as more and more is uncovered and verified.
And many of us alive at the time are still kicking and we remember. In my case, I grew up with people who survived the Holocaust and lived under the Nazis as well as the Tzars and the Soviets. I’m hardly alone.
This is perhaps the very best way to handle things.
...it smelled like burning wires.
_____________________________
For me, it was the smell of BBQ! Lasted about 1 year and 3 months. Now, I occasionally think charcoal is burning, but faint and not often.
Heard about others who said they smelled sulfur, like a match being struck.
A year? Holy cow! I gotta put up with this for a year? Well, that was in Jan, so I got 5 more months.
Yes. You make a good point.
I am a biochemist, and Fuellmich DOES make a lot of sense.
The only thing he seems not to fully understand is that a biological method of analysis (specifically, the PCR test for COVID-19) can be set up to maximize sensitivity (i.e., to detect as many positive cases as possible), OR it can be set up to maximize specificity (i.e., to avoid as many false positives as possible). But one cannot simultaneously maximize BOTH sensitivity AND specificity.
So, a sensitive PCR test is NOT some kind of evil plot: its high false positive rate is inevitable for a maximally sensitive test.
Here is a sample.
“COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough case investigation
Information for public health, clinical, and reference laboratories.
Objective
Investigate SARS-CoV-2 infections among people who received COVID-19 vaccine to identify trends or clustering in demographic, the administered vaccine, or the infecting virus
“Respiratory specimen for SARS-CoV-2 sequencing
• Specimen selection
o Clinical specimens for sequencing should have an RT-PCR Ct value ≤28.
o If a Ct value is not available, specimens that are positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen by another testing modality may be sent.”
They basically don't want positive results from vaccinated persons unless the RT-PCR is less than <28
Thanks. I believed it when I read it, I just couldn’t be sure or remember the exact specific details. So now I do because I read it on the internet. ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.