Given that the jab doesn't actually prevent the disease, those taking the jab risk exposure to the combination of the coof spike cooties and the coof jab spike cooties. Those who take the jab AFTER they've had COVID guarantee themselves this double exposure.
Either one of those creates the risk of death or injury. Having both might explain why jabbed people are more likely to die once they catch COVID than are unjabbed people.
That's my 'highly informed, scientifically literate and sophisticated" opinion.
Interesting. A co-worker had the Covid a few months back, then after recovery, got the jab. And the second jab. Was pretty sick after the second jab, though that’s known to be common. I never asked him why he got the jab after gaining natural immunity, but I suspect his wife may have influenced that decision.
I will come back and give you the whole story once I'm fully out of the woods, but I can tell you that I am very thankful I had Ivermectin on hand as well as Quercetin (though I wasn't taking anywhere near enough). Keep taking the D3, Zinc, K2-7, C, NAC, etc. It has definitely helped. Stock up on herbal medicines such as fresh pine needles, star anise, fennel seed, mullein leaf. Goji berries and schizandra tincture. (dragonherbs.com) Turn off the news and trust in God!
” COVID Shot Home Visits Unconstitutional and Unethical
AAPS issued the following statement in response to planned home visits:
The Biden Administration has announced plans to send agents “door to door” in order to “get remaining Americans vaccinated, by ensuring they have the information they need on how both safe and accessible the vaccine is.”
A leaked script from the Lake County Health Department in Illinois tells the Community Health Ambassadors to keep track of the addresses and responses from residents in a “Doorknocking Spreadsheet.”
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) makes the following observations:
The U.S. Constitution provides no authority for the federal government to be involved in medicine, for example, by recommending, promoting, or mandating treatments.
If the Ambassador knows a person’s vaccination status, the government has already been collecting personal health data and sharing it with agents having nothing to do with the person’s care, a violation of the Fourth Amendment. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) will not protect you—it allows very broad disclosure to government officials.
States have the lawful authority to regulate the practice of medicine, but the Ambassadors are evidently not under any constraints regarding training, credentialing, documentation, or scope of practice, although they are collecting data and giving medical advice without supervision. Even medical assistants and medical scribes need to meet certain qualifications.
Ambassadors are promoting an experimental product, with no information on risks. Even if a product is FDA-approved, advertisers and medical professionals must divulge risks, such as heart inflammation, paralysis from Guillain-Barré or other causes, miscarriage, or death. Contrast the Ambassador’s script with the disclosures on a television ad for a drug, say one to treat your dog’s heartworm.
In the opinion of AAPS, this door-to-door solicitation violates the ethical principles of protecting confidentiality and informed consent. Health professionals need a patient’s implied consent even to be seen; they may not simply show up uninvited at a stranger’s home.
For both legal and ethical reasons, the program should be discontinued at once, AAPS states.
Read Statement Online: https://aapsonline.org/covid-shot-home-visits-unconstitutional-and-unethical/ “