Replies

What is Q? Q is a plan that originated in its beginning in 1963. Knowing the several thousand year old Cabal-Illuminati-Deep State was at the peak to completing agenda 2030 (NWO), which would have destroyed the Constitution, leaving us in a Communist state. With no right or freedom of speech, for anyone who stepped out of line would be disciplined orre-educated. One leader, one world government. As there will be no middle class, it'll be a select few elite that get vastly wealthy off the slave labor of 99% of the rest of us. Re-education would be put upon the public, stripping us of free thinking through indoctrination. On 11-22-63 was the breaking point for the white hats, knowing the vast power of the enemy was almost beyond defeat. The assassination of JFK is a CRITICAL moment in history, and created the conflict we are currently facing. So with (certain) family members, the white hats within the CIA & NSA created a legal plan to fight back using the judicial system as per our Constitution. Many of deeds were allowed to happen only so we can use it against them in their end game (Patriot Act - FISA), for the white hats have been building evidence for decades. The only thing that was missing was the right leader to help the intelligence agencies and the military to carry out such a plan. The 16 year plan to destroy America would have been completed by both terms of BHO & HRC, so white hats knew they had to act fast. So they had to wait for the Right leader (Trump), as the importance of 2016 cannot be underestimated. So the military and white hats informed Trump, and asked him to run for POTUS. The Patriot that Trump is, accepted. With the most important fight in the world's history for the last Soverign Nation, Trump had to go all in and win the people. But that's not enough. They needed an outlet to inform the public on current events, bypassing the media on what is really going on; so that is why we have Q. Q is the media for those who seek truth beyond the propaganda, and a way to fight back as digital soldiers. With the arrival of Q, the "thought" of the plan, became "The Plan," since now white hats & military intelligence has a way to connect to Patriots directly. Now Patriots have a source of information beyond the MSM to fight the evil cabal who enslaved us for centuries. The World is about to change, but never forget where it all started. R.I.P. Mr. President WRWY - The Punisher https://gab.com/PunishDem2021/posts/106577174449642405

Who defines what is "hate speech"?

@ParisKnight
36m
· "Remember folks.. 90% of trolls arguing with you online are paid professionals."

"Don't listen to trolls and don't pay any attention to their fake patriotic looking avatars and memes. That's why they were sent here: to deceive and intimidate people into silence."

"Here's a list of their compensation payouts for "fighting online hate speech"."

Republicans, Democrats and the Vaccine

More Republicans than Democrats appear to be “vaccine hesitant” — that is, reluctant for one reason or another — to take the COVID-19 vaccine. They’ve gotten the treatment you might expect in some quarters of the press. “Right-wing anti-vaccine hysteria is increasing. We’ll all pay the price,” read one headline in The Washington Post. In The New York Times, there was, “Far-Right Extremists Move From ‘Stop the Steal’ to Stop the Vaccine.” The Daily Beast chimed in with “The GOP’s Paranoid Streak From John Birchers to Anti-Vaxxers.” You get the idea.

But it’s not hard to imagine a different picture. If President Donald Trump had won reelection, the vaccine skepticism might have leaned more to the other side. We can’t say that for sure, of course, but we do know that during the 2020 campaign, top Democratic leaders, like presidential nominee Joe Biden and running mate Kamala Harris, laid the groundwork for vaccine skepticism.

For example, during a CNN interview on Sept. 5, with the vaccine still in development under Trump’s historic Operation Warp Speed, Harris was asked if she would get the vaccine when it was ready. It depends, Harris answered. “I will say that I would not trust Donald Trump,” she continued, “and it would have to be a credible source of information that talks about the efficacy and the reliability of whatever he’s talking about. I will not take [Trump’s] word for it.”

..moar