[Bell Bouy II]

Article is an investment point of view, doesnt touch on adverse reactions.

[Karl Spooner]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Key takeaways from study.

Review
Open Access
Published: 31 October 2016
Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms

**The developmental toxicity of GFNs may induce structural abnormalities, growth retardation, behavioural and functional abnormalities, and even death.

**DNA damage can not only initiate cancer development but also possibly threaten the health of the next generation if the mutagenic potential of GO arises in reproductive cells, which impacts fertility and the health of offspring [112, 190].

**The cytotoxicity of GFNs in vitro has been verified in various cells to change the cell viability and morphology, destroy the membrane integrity, and induce DNA damage [110–112]. GO or rGO decrease cell adhesion; induce cell apoptosis; and enter lysosomes, mitochondria, cell nuclei, and endoplasm [113].

GQDs entered cells and induced DNA damage by the increased expression of p53, Rad 51, and OGG1 proteins in NIH-3 T3 cells [87].

https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y

[Baldwin77]

I think that’s the point.

Big Pharma DESIGNED the vax sort of like Microsoft was “designed” - so you had to have constant “updates”.

[Republican Wildcat]

Article is an investment point of view

Exactly - the article is about how the vaccines are even more effective at producing long term immunity than even their producers thought they may be and how that could affect sales going forward.

But the responses indicate people did not even read this...again, it's all about the narrative. Fact and truth are irrelevant.