Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DollarStoreGandalf
That's true. But I think the article is more about Q pushers on social media, of which there were many.

Those would be anons not Qanons but they weren't really anonymous so they weren't truly anons. The only ones that could be called anons were those digging on 8chan/8kun. I think it's important that we don't allow the MSM to define the terms.

131 posted on 07/10/2021 4:57:55 PM PDT by upsdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: upsdriver
“ Those would be anons not Qanons but they weren't really anonymous so they weren't truly anons. The only ones that could be called anons were those digging on 8chan/8kun. I think it's important that we don't allow the MSM to define the terms. ”

~~~~~~~~~

Digging, Sharing, Praying, and Meme-ing on 4chan/8chan/8kun… Yup.

But FR is Home and my FRiends are here and also part of the fight.

The Derps aren’t just afraid of the straight up, “Truly Anon”, “Only ever working where Q Posts” “Anons”.

That could be dealt with.

Now it’s looking like nothing can stop what is coming.

~Easy


139 posted on 07/10/2021 5:31:48 PM PDT by EasySt (Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see #KAG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: upsdriver

Except the media has already defined the terms. The only who people actually care to make a distinction are Q adherents. The rest of us don’t care.


141 posted on 07/10/2021 6:05:00 PM PDT by DollarStoreGandalf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson