Since Q is discussing social media and algorithms, seems that the who is connected to that topic specifically. The capitalization seems to possibly mean that someone/s other than the apparent someone/s is the WHO that is controlling the algorithms. Different layers of someone/s. Copying so anyone reading our comments will see what the drop is:
830
Q !UW.yye1fxo 03/03/2018 23:15:14 ID: 85cc02
Archive Bread/Post Links: 543463 / 544206
Direct Link: 544206
What I say a class action lawsuit?
When is it effective?
Who controls the narrative?
WHO wrote the singular censorship algorithm?
WHO deployed the algorithm?
WHO instructed them to deploy the algorithm?
SAME embed across multiple platforms.
Why?
Why is the timing relevant?
Where is @Snowden?
Why did ES leave G?
Why has NK out of the news cycle?
Define false flag?
What event(s) change the news cycle?
Why didn’t LV change the news cycle?
You have more than your know.
BOOM.
Q
Afternoon WAR ROOM SHOW is on now
4-5pm central
Naomi Wolf on talking about tyrannical government illegally forcing medical procedure on Americans....and “it’s about the data”.
Since Q is discussing social media and algorithms, seems that the who is connected to that topic specifically. The capitalization seems to possibly mean that someone/s other than the apparent someone/s is the WHO that is controlling the algorithms. Different layers of someone/s. Copying so anyone reading our comments will see what the drop is:
—-
Geez! That was in right in front of me. I swear, when I first read it my mind snapped right to COVID. Thanks again lj!
"... very early on in the open source discussion, I was saying data is going to be the new source of lock-in, we shouldn't be so focused on source code," he adds. "If we had focused a lot more on issues of what it means when somebody controls the data, when somebody controls the algorithms which shape what data people see? That's where the open source discussion needs to be now."
It has become common practice in scientific journals for an author of an article to include the data on which the article's conclusions are based. Imagine if it became common practice for political writers to do the same?