I’m still uncertain of the “true” purpose of Durham, especially due to the legal requirements of the position. That was why I posted the op-ed. But as RN stated up thread Durham is still there and his purpose is a mystery. I agreed saying Joe and the Ho and their people want Durham to stay in the shadows because whatever he has isn’t beneficial to them. That’s why IMO they haven’t dismissed him because of the publicity it would bring. Also the demo-fascists, more than likely, have broken the same law when using people for the same purpose against the GOP. AFWK Durham could be there to distract from the real investigation going on behind the scene. Right now IMO Durham’s role or purpose is TBD.