No, he didn’t say. He said it was “just in”, but his is what I found from last night. Maybe he is referring to this:
DOJ says federal law doesn’t bar businesses, agencies from mandating Covid vaccines
The opinion was released shortly after the VA became the first federal agency to require shots for employees.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/26/va-vaccine-health-care-workers-500750
Thanks! That’s probably it.
I read the first couple of pages; appears to be addressing specifically the EUA issue.
“you have asked whether the “option to accept or refuse” condition in section 564 prohibits entities from imposing such vaccination requirements while the only available vaccines for COVID-19 remain subject to EUAs. We conclude, consistent with FDA’s interpretation, that it does not. This language in section 564 specifies only that certain information be provided to potential vaccine recipients and does not prohibit entities from imposing vaccination requirements.”
“ DOJ says federal law doesn’t bar businesses, agencies from mandating Covid vaccines”
I don’t see how they can say that with the Hippa laws in place