Replies

TheLastRefuge
@TheLastRefuge2

1. Just a hunch but it appears the DC enforcers, ie. the DOJ/FBI, are preparing for a larger awakening amid the American people.

From the 30,000 ft level they seem to increasingly fear a grassroot solution to a corrupt DC government. A solution I would call “extreme federalism”

2. The solution to the scale of DC corruption is local and state action using the constitution, specifically the 10th amendment, against the advancing overreach of corrupt DC officials.

3. Extreme federalism is local and state government refusing to comply, or totally ignoring, unconstitutional demands by the federal government.

4. This approach can become visible in varying degrees of intensity. State laws protecting voting integrity is only one facet.

5. The issue of voter ID is a critical one that gets conflated by parseltongue words intended to confuse the issue.

The issue of voter ID is NOT about proving “who you are“; the issue of voter ID is “proving you are eligible to vote“.

6. Erosion of state requirements for valid and authentic voter ID has made the challenge more difficult.

Ex. a driver’s license is NOT proof that you are eligible to vote. A utility bill or some arbitrary document is also NOT proof of that either.

7. To be eligible to vote you have to provide a legal: (1) Birth certificate, or (2) A Certificate of Naturalization, or (3) a voter ID which was obtained with one of the above.

Voter ID is not proving who you are; voter ID is proving you are lawfully eligible to vote.

8. The DOJ does not want to see people having to prove they are lawfully eligible to vote, that is the essence of the lawsuit against Georgia – and that will be the essence of every lawsuit of a similar nature.

9. BURIED ...”DAG Lisa Monaco also issued a memo to U.S. Attnys & FBI Field Offices today on investigating & prosecuting threats to election officials. To assist with this important effort the department will also establish an intra-Dept task force to address the rising threats.”

10. As we have mentioned previously, the United States Department of Justice is prepared to use federal law enforcement (ie. The FBI) to secure their position.

The purpose of this announcement should be crystal clear to everyone.

11. Beyond simple legislative push-back, imagine if the State of Texas refused to facilitate any task for the border visit by Kamala Harris. No Texas state trooper escorts, no security, no facilitation once the White House entourage exits the airport.

12. “Extreme federalism” is the intentional use of the state right provisions outlined within the constitution to stop facilitating federal offices in any form or function.

13. Imagine if FBI field offices were forced to close by state action taking back ownership of the property by eminent domain. Imagine if state national guard elements were instructed not to comply with federal requests for support.

14. Extreme federalism is local sheriffs, constitutional officers, rebuking unconstitutional decrees and refusing to comply with federal agencies.

15. Extreme federalism is executed along the same concept, the same point of reference for “sanctuary cities” or “sanctuary states” who defy federal law.

State legalization of federally prohibited marijuana use is another example.

16. However, extreme federalism is almost the reverse scenario where the unconstitutional efforts are identified by states who then create sanctuaries for law-abiding citizens; those who forcefully demand representative government and self-determination.

17. Extreme federalism is a reaffirmation of the original intent of the United States constitution, and we do not need F-15s and nuclear weapons to achieve it.

What we need is/are: strong–will, brave state-level leadership and unrelenting citizen determination.

18. Ultimately, if you look at how DC is positioning themselves, “extreme federalism” is exactly what the JoeBama crew are preparing themselves to fight.

/END

https://twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/1408573596776206337