To me, this is just not acceptable talk. There was nothing wrong about the topic, there was something very wrong with bagsters responses. So, instead of addressing the real problem, the comment was that the DISCUSSION is wrong. yeah right
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You left our thread in angry disappointment once before. It seems you are even more disappointed this time.
I haven’t been here for the dispute and am not declaring a ‘side’; I’m just saying it appears, based on comments I’ve read, to involve a topic that has worn thin and remains in dispute for specific people, while others wish to move on.
Please allow this topic to move to pm or take up residence in Festival in the prior thread as others involved seem willing to do.
You left our thread in angry disappointment once before. It seems you are even more disappointed this time.
Wrong. I disagreed with bagster on how the police should honor their oaths. I was respectful, and stated my case as well I could. I was then called every name in the book by several on this thread. I sent you a private message asking for your help because it seemed like previously we had some common ground on this topic. Instead, you sided with those who refused to even hear a different point of view. One of the q folks contacted Jim R. and he nicely asked me to leave that specific thread. Not a single post of mine was pulled, and I broke no FR rules. My big crime was I didn’t agree with the crowds, and bagsters point of view.
Honestly RN, are the comments from bagster that I posted ok with you? I pretty much thought you were respectful of JR’s rules, and these comments don’t pass that test.
+++!!!