Does this mean the vaccines are dangerous if you catch COVID or dangerous whether you catch it or not?
the short answer is who knows, but... for me
unfortunately, i think it would be dangerous whether you’ve had sar covid2 or not if you happen to be vulnerable to the to the cyto toxic spike protein.
apparently the claim is that this issue is with the naked spike protein alone. which i guess you’d have the most of with the vaccine.
the virus is going to be whole and so not naked, thus different appearing to the immune system.
thus if you’ve had covid19, at this point, i wouldn’t get any vaccine producing a naked spike.
my two cents.
Here’s the general issue .... the spike was SUPPOSED to stay in the muscle while you developed antibodies for it - there is a time gap from the shot to your body being able to “kill” the spikes. What they have found out is that within 24 hours, there is spread all over. First to the lymphs, then to various organs. For women, ovaries seems to be a favorite spot to accumulate. Since the spike protein itself is toxic, what damage is it doing while roaming around the body until you have the antibodies developed to deal with it?
This is a really bad development. Dr. Malone said he thinks mRNA is a good technology for vaccines, but he does not think this “vaccine” is a good one.
You should listen to the podcast ... he goes into the data packets received from the pharma companies & what testing was NOT done. Genetic and reproductive are two areas not tested. He is afraid that those getting the jab may not be affected, but the next generation might .... he even brought up ‘thalidomide babies’ as an example (which surprised me that he would go there). As I said, listen to the podcast. The other guest is passionate, a bit hard to listen to, but the podcast is worth it for Dr. Malone’s comments alone.