the murderous DNA operating systems are NOT vaccines.
The vaccines are not experimental. They are approved under EUA. The fact that you are denying is that they each went through clinical phased trials 1-3 like anything else. There were over 100,000 doses given in clinical trial.
The fact that is is brought by EUA recognizes an urgency exists that makes it reasonable to utilize the vaccine to contribute to reduction of spread of disease.
The EUA necessarily requires that there are no other safe and efficacious treatments of the disease. While there are other proposed treatments such as ivermectin and HCQ they fail on efficacious which would be something that was strong enough to stop progression or spread of disease. Whatever activity these medications have against covid, despite millions of treatments with the medications it did not significantly reduce or stop the trajectory of the disease in terms of spread or severity to be judged worthy of not pursuing other modalities control covid.
Early on there was great interest in these meds. If it were a cure the pandemic would have ended. It was not. So we need to continue to pursue treatments and vaccines. Vaccines are now clearly making on roads alongside of natural immunity (and yes I agree those who have recovered do not need vaccine) and the emergence of targeted therapeutics specific to covid as antivirals that will be not unlike tamiflu.
This will control the pandemic to minimal impact. But what we cannot say with any truth is that nonspecific therapies offer an acceptable level of treatment to abandon any other treatment or prevention modalities.
Disagree. They are still experimental.
Interestingly, he mentioned the spell you seem to be under
the murderous DNA operating systems are NOT vaccines.
The fact that you are denying is that they each went through clinical phased trials 1-3 like anything else. There were over 100,000 doses given in clinical trial.
_____________________________
Given that the above is accurate:
1) How then did the clinical trial apparently miss the toxicity of the spike protein? Was there a conclusion that the spike protein was benign?
2) Is there a link to the adverse reactions encountered in those 100k does? I’d prefer something broken out of the reports, as I am forced to read such documents slowly along with a medical dictionary and I lack the statistical expertise needed to interpret such trials.
3) Would you happen to know how long these trials took?
4) What time period was used to evaluate long-term reactions?
5)Is it fair to conclude that these mRNA vaccines were already trialed and the percentages of adverse reaction known in advance of the EUA, given how quickly they were rolled out?
6) Were the physicians employed in hospitals and by large medical organizations allowed to use the exact protocols of McCullough or Zelensky or Fleming (the 3 I am aware of)in outpatients with mild disease?
7)Why, in your professional estimation, did the above clinicians have such success with their out patient protocols?
8) As an anesthesiologist, was there a point in your clinical experience where you questioned mechanical ventilation? If so, was it ventilation, per se, or a matter of parameters used (time, pressure, etc)?
9) Isn’t it interesting, given the politicization of all aspects of our society these days, that prominent leftists and their organizations appear to have found common cause with regard to these mRNA vaccines with other practitioners and organizations that are routinely characterized as right-leaning to alt-right?
10) Do you have any reservations at all about the vaccines? What is your thinking on the adverse reactions, leaving aside the stats, since this is the largest inoculation in the history of the world? Specifically, 1) what is your professional reaction to the methodology of turning a human cell within a living person into a spike protein producer and 2)do you have any concerns about the vaccines forcing mutation of the original virus?
11) From the extensive trials, what is the time taken to clear the spike proteins from a living human body? At what point does the human cell cease manufacturing this protein?
12)If this occurs, is it then prudent to administer booster inoculations?
The Phase 3 COVE study from 11/16/2020 of ModeRNA had 5 in stage 3 trials that actually got the shot.
EUA was given based on the reaction of those 5.
“The primary endpoint of the Phase 3 COVE study is based on the analysis of COVID-19 cases confirmed and adjudicated starting two weeks following the second dose of vaccine. This first interim analysis was based on 95 cases, of which 90 cases of COVID-19 were observed in the placebo group versus 5 cases observed in the mRNA-1273 group, resulting in a point estimate of vaccine efficacy of 94.5% (p <0.0001).”