Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: palmer

However, by increasing the cycle counts to insure lots o f positives (90% more than actual), the need for the shot is dramatically reduced. The risk for most is very small for most vs injecting an experimental jab.


37 posted on 06/11/2021 4:19:22 AM PDT by MassachusettsConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: MassachusettsConservative
The risk for most is very small for most vs injecting an experimental jab.

Your allegations about cycle counts are easy to dismiss. The deaths from COVID in all vaccinated people are 535 total. The deaths from COVID in the general population were 44,000 since April 1. That means that 98 or 99% of the deaths since then could have been avoided by being vaccinated.

That percentage will decrease as COVID wanes (thanks to natural immunity plus vaccination). That's because the chance of getting COVID is dropping dramatically. Anyone considering the vaccine now should take into account the latest data showing a reduced need tor anyone in particular to take it. Their own risks should determine their choice.

Are they at risk of getting and spreading the disease? For example, I think most nursing home staff should choose vaccination, But all of them don't need to, especially if their lifestyle gives them little or no chance of COVID.

I have also always favored making discrimination illegal: https://www.huschblackwell.com/newsandinsights/50-state-update-on-pending-legislation-pertaining-to-employer-mandated-vaccinations#linktojump21 Call your state rep.

40 posted on 06/11/2021 5:34:00 AM PDT by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson