Wait, you provide a link to the actual study to prove the veracity of your “leaked” information claim, but the study is illegitimate because it contradicts the claim you used the same study to support.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I did not say the study is illegitimate. I am saying ‘happy’ interpretations of study data is illegitimate and baseless.
As evidence leaks out, every biased source proclaims there’s no need to worry.
As data reaches the public, we can see many interpretations of the data serve special interests. Objective review can tell us there’s an issue with vaccine particles collecting in the ovaries. We know studies were brief and biased.
There are other studies pointing to this issue which those who are excessively optimistic dismiss out of hand. We can still use the research, but we can use it to investigate further.
How many women who took the Covid mRNA “vax” got pregnant and had children? NONE. It was all done and “approved” under an Emergency Use Authorization at Warp Speed.
Check out “thalidomide babies.” Their moms took a drug that had more testing than this bogus Covid “vax” (that is not a dictionary definition vaccine at all.)
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=thalidomide+babies&t=chromentp&atb=v134-1&iax=images&ia=images
The Covid mRNA mass vax campaign is the biggest human subject experiment in history.
I choose to be in the control group.