Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah

Thank you - I thought it had something to do with filibuster. I think they have to vote on eliminating the filibuster rule and they can’t get 60 to vote to eliminate it. If I’m wrong let me know!
*******************
Unfortunately it only takes 51+ votes to get rid of the fillibuster:

“At times, the “nuclear option” has been proposed to eliminate the 60 vote threshold for certain matters before the Senate. The nuclear option is a parliamentary procedure that allows the Senate to override one of its standing rules, including the 60-vote rule to close debate, by a simple majority (51+ votes or 50 votes with the Vice President casting the tie-breaking vote), rather than the two-thirds supermajority normally required to amend Senate rules.”

First employed in 2013:
“At times, the “nuclear option” has been proposed to eliminate the 60 vote threshold for certain matters before the Senate. The nuclear option is a parliamentary procedure that allows the Senate to override one of its standing rules, including the 60-vote rule to close debate, by a simple majority (51+ votes or 50 votes with the Vice President casting the tie-breaking vote), rather than the two-thirds supermajority normally required to amend Senate rules.


1,094 posted on 05/31/2021 4:18:04 PM PDT by Yulee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1093 | View Replies ]


To: Yulee

Thanks for the info. Interesting the demsheviks have not voted to eliminate the filibuster; I’ve read that a dem or two don’t want to eliminate it. I suppose some might want to keep it thinking that they will be minority party sometime.


1,096 posted on 05/31/2021 4:25:45 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Mercy to the cruel is cruelty to the innocent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1094 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson