“How would faking his death solve any of the problems I just mentioned (or any others that I haven’t)”
I’m thinking outside of the box. But Q did mention JFK Jr.’s plane crash. Somewhat odd that he didn’t refer to it as his “death”, though, isn’t it?
“But Q did mention JFK Jr.’s plane crash. Somewhat odd that he didn’t refer to it as his “death”, though, isn’t it?”
It’s interesting. Not proof, but interesting. Still, I’m skeptical. Even if his life’s mission was to avenge his father’s death, how would faking his death help in that pursuit?
Referring to JFK Jr.’s plane crash rather than his death may have just been an economical way of saying that he was murdered. If Q had instead referred to 1999 as merely the year of JFK Jr.’s death, it would have been less obvious that he was murdered. Being that Q had previously mentioned the cabal’s predilection for using plane crashes to murder their adversaries, referring to it that way may have been Q’s way of suggesting he was murdered.