Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman

“he also agreed with you that space itself is not a physical thing that could be warped or compressed.”

No he didn’t.


38 posted on 05/18/2021 1:12:43 PM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: NobleFree

Yes, he most certainly did. I believe he stated it in one of his New York Times articles, which they like to lock up behind a paywall, but I’ll try to find a link to it for you when I get a chance.

You may be confused because of course he talks about “length contraction”, but there is a very good reason that although he called the correlating effect “time dilation”, he did not use the term “space contraction”, but rather “length contraction” instead. That was a very deliberate choice on Einstein’s part.


50 posted on 05/18/2021 1:42:34 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: NobleFree
“he also agreed with you that space itself is not a physical thing that could be warped or compressed.”

------No he didn’t.

Well considering it was all at one time smaller than a BB wouldn't that be compressed and what it is now, be expanded? Where was space then since it wasn't needed?

56 posted on 05/18/2021 1:57:30 PM PDT by itsahoot (The election was stolen and there isn't a dang thang you can do about it. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson