[Wuli]

I do not deny your premise - that sight is not everything.

However, one person cannot record the smell and accurately relay that exact smell to someone else. People can record sound, but in most UFO instances they rarely do and/or the distance to what they see from where they stand is so great there is likely no local sound that seems to be identified with the object. The object does not land so they cannot touch it and even if it did land and they touched it, we do not have super objective “touch recorders” we only have human’s subjective touch descriptions.

So, that does leave sight, and what was seen and EXACTLY what the object looked like. BUT that one attribute that can be done and can be done clearly is usally not done or not done clearly.

So any kind of “evidence” that is transmissible with complete transparency is always absent.

Any other kinds of “proof” may render a “belief” that is “true” to the believer, but that does nothing to convince anyone else.

Only the unmistakable pictures will start to end the mystery.

[BDParrish]

I see what you are saying. What I meant to say is that the persons who have told me their stories always confirm that there is no other effect on the environment at the time they witnessed it. ONLY a sight. Even in cases where the UFO was only 100feet away.