It is like shooting fish in a barrel, you're kind of right about that in a backwards kind of way.
Posted on 05/06/2021 12:31:40 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
It is like shooting fish in a barrel, you're kind of right about that in a backwards kind of way.
it’s my God given right to question our government and it’s overreach anytime i want to...
I agree. 100%.
But what I’m saying is if you don’t trust your own government where should you get good or honest information?
What do you call someone who got all Ds in Medical School?
“Doctor”.
I’m sorry you’ve had to deal with the suffering you’ve had to see in the ER/ICU.
But your emotions are no more valid a reason to force an untested experimental therapy, on the whole country, for a virus which (by your own post) only 14% of the country had been exposed to, when the deaths are overwhelmingly concentrated in the age 70+ cohort with existing comorbidities.
Especially not when there are other MDs who had all kinds of success treating this with either OTC remedies like Ivermectin, or off-label well-known (cheap!) prescriptions like Budenoside or Hydroxychloroquine/Zinc.
And when the people pushing the jabs stand to make billions or tens of billions of dollars pushing them.
And when the proposed jab is an experimental technique which failed BIGLY in animal trials in the past.
And medical and scientific literature is sussing out the biochemical / molecular mechanism by which the untested technique causes adverse effects.
And the (voluntary, and Harvard says it catches 1% of the cases) VAERS system, has reported more deaths in 1 year or so “correlated” to this new treatment, than to the total deaths from any other “vaccine” in the history of the program
DESPITE SLOW WALKING THE DATA ENTRY
and when doctors with over 600 literature citations point out that other treatments were given black-box warnings at 5 deaths and yanked at 25 deaths
But this undertested treatment, is still being pushed more frantically and more forcefully than ever, after over 3000 deaths reported in the states, and a similar number in Europe
And when two different European countries have ceased allowing different versions of these jabs due to safety concerns.
That’s why preventing it from replicating is an integral part of the vaccine production process.
Only....these fake ‘vaccines’ don’t do that, with their 60% “efficacy” rate.
In fact.....there are questions, now, as to whether or not they may actually ‘speed’ up the replication process. Especially with their 40% ++ breakthrough/infection rates, as well as (GOK how many) clotting cases.
In fact, the UK is now estimating that 60 - 70 % of their new infections/cases will be from those already ‘vax’d’.
If you happen to have a link showing how these fake ‘vax’s’ 100 % prevent replication, please provide.
Sick people shed the virus. Of course.
RC, you've just got to learn this one thing, if nothing else. You have been lied to your ENTIRE life, and in a big way.
#ThePeopleYouTrustTheMost
Like Israel.
Hahahahahahahahaha.
Child.
How about the Chair of Chemistry at Harvard, who was arrested for getting $50k/month under the table from the Chicoms for helping them set up a nanotechnology facility in Wuhan?
This is why winking at RINOs and corrupt globalists was such a bad idea.
Are YOU a doctor, rc???
Or, just a pharm tech? NOT that that’s a bad job.
What qualifies YOU to give ‘random people life and death advice’ over the internet?
Did you stay at a Holiday Inn Express with mommy and daddy, recently?
gw.....as to your question about what do you call someone who made all Ds, in med school.....answer: a proctologist.
Are we certain that it’s only the ‘china virus’ that these experimental ‘vax’d’ folks are shedding?
Asking for at least half of the country :-)
You may not know it, but Israel has its own large Leftist base.
If there was any any hanky-panky there would be screams from the mountains of Elat.
#StopSharting!
If you have a reputable source for your assertions I’ll look at them.
How funny. I just had this very same convo with the OTHER paramedic (EMT) who thinks his job makes him some kinda expert on covid and vaccines.
It didn't go well for him. You sure you wanna do this, RC?
Right when we're gettin' along so well?
I'll give you a hint. You give people shots. You have no idea what's in the syringe. You just do what you're told.
There. Deal with that.
Will a medical professor, at Texas A&M suffice?
One whose written numerous, peer reviewed papers/studies, on virology, over the years and whose partnered with several docs, worldwide for early treatment protocol?
And, who has tesitified in front of the US and TX Senate, about Covid-19?
Show me the excess deaths county-by-county or state-by-state, broken up by age cohort.
And do the same for COVID cases.
Let's see if the two really do overlap.
The number of deaths reported as entirely due to COVID are a grave (C W I D T?) exaggeration, because a bunch of crooked politicians and other smelled billions in profits.
There's a difference between "proximate cause of death" and "contributing cause".
And the inventor of PCR, who won the Nobel for it, said it was not meant as a diagnostic tool; and the CDC also played around with the number of cycles to be used to "diagnose" COVID, dropping it to 28 after POTATUS came into office / the mRNA jabs took off.
How conveeeeeeenient.
I don’t wink at anyone.
Many here on FR don’t. For the Covid vaccine or against.
What I’m trying to say is that are billions of people and their respective governments all involved in some great conspiracy??
I doubt it.
Link to something.
Like this...
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2104974?query=featured_home
“... The estimated effectiveness of the vaccine against any documented infection with the B.1.1.7 variant was 89.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.9 to 92.3) at 14 or more days after the second dose (Table 1 and Table S2). The effectiveness against any documented infection with the B.1.351 variant was 75.0% (95% CI, 70.5 to 78.9). Vaccine effectiveness against severe, critical, or fatal disease due to infection with any SARS-CoV-2 (with the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants being predominant within Qatar) was very high, at 97.4% (95% CI, 92.2 to 99.5). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these results (Table S3)...”
Would you rather be a proctogist’s lawyer or a lawyer’s proctologist? ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.