Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster

You realize that as soon as a new genetic version is discovered it is mapped and patented, don’t you?

Your discovery is the genetic code for the SARS virus. This is SARS-2.

It’s not the same thing.


70 posted on 05/05/2021 5:11:49 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Vermont Lt; ransomnote
You realize that as soon as a new genetic version is discovered it is mapped and patented, don’t you?

I was under the impression that naturally occurring viruses could not be patented. Only man made ones. Like the rona. So there are not new versions 'discovered' that get patented. Only lab-made bio weapons.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

Biological patents in the United States

As with all utility patents in the United States, a biological patent provides the patent holder with the right to exclude others from making, using, selling, or importing the claimed invention or discovery in biology for a limited period of time - for patents filed after 1998, 20 years from the filing date.

Until recently, natural biological substances themselves could be patented (apart from any associated process or usage) in the United States if they were sufficiently "isolated" from their naturally occurring states. Prominent historical examples of such patents on isolated products of nature include adrenaline, insulin, vitamin B12, and gene patents. However, the US Supreme Court ruled in 2013 that mere isolation by itself is not sufficient for something to be deemed inventive subject matter.


72 posted on 05/05/2021 5:40:31 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson