Doesn't it seem like there would be no visual pattern to the number of days following vaccination before a stroke was reported to have occurred, if all strokes reported were random events expected to happen anyway?
From CDC VAERS Data Set Posted here: https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3920760/posts?page=2647#2647
It may be that people are just less likely to report a stroke in VAERS, as time goes on. Whatever happens on vaccination day, will likely be suspected to be from the vaccine, but that subjective perception of association naturally drops over time.
It is a tiny percentage to study - a few hundred cases out of over 200 million shots. Reporting bias could account for it.
And from their very own VAERS.
Its getting very hard for the vax-bots to claim 'no adverse effects' from the vax, as the info comes pouring in.
