You’re just saying things, but then putting it in quotes as though you got it from an authoritative source. You didn’t. You just conjured it up and presented it as though it should carry more weight than it should. That’s dishonest.
Goot lawd amighty. I don't need an 'authoritative source to say something a loaf of bread could understand.
You got to be the worst arguer on the internet.
Saying that the reported events to VAERS DON'T prove that the vax DID NOT have something to do with the event is pretty much third grade stuff. Don't need even graduate high school to figure that one out.
That’s dishonest.
You lie again. Its completely honest. Don't be mad that my brain works better than yours.
Bearing false witness is a sin.
Then you're going straight to hell. Repent, sinner!
Lemme try to make it easy for you.
*gets out crayons*
YOU said, VAERS reports don't PROVE the vax caused the negative event. You even had to quote VAERS to make that statement. A child could know that.
I said, VAERS reports don't DISPROVE the vax cause the event. A retarded child could know that.
If you are to be believed, each and every one of those 'negative events' would have happened on the exact same day as if the person hadn't taken the vax. It stretches credulity, goodman. Your argument is wind.
What is so hard for you to admit that VAERS reports neither prove or disprove the vax is responsible? VAERS is intended to look for trends and trigger further investigation and action.
And right now, the 'trend' is worse in a matter of months than previously seen in other vaccines in decades.
Talk about bearing false witness. Sheesh.
p.s. Sure are a lot of coincidences with the vax, amirite?
