Apologies for not reading your thread on VAERS data regarding strokes following vaccines, but have three questions
~~~~~~~~~~~~
ransomnote: Apology not accepted. You want to critique and you start by saying you haven’t read it?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did you normalize results between vaccines based on number delivered? Your snip of VAERS shows numbers for COVID and zoster, which are shingles vaccines I believe. Seems like a lot more people have got COVID vaccines than shingles, and maybe we should be concerned about the latter...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ransomnote: Those vaccines are the top 5 with the most records of stroke in VAERS.
Given that less than 1% of the actual results for any vaccine adverse events are ever reported to the CDC, and given that the CDC has entered far less than 25% of the reports it has already received for Covid-19 vaccines, I think the problem is that it’s reasonable to estimate that Covid-19 vaccines have triggered more reports of stroke than all other vaccines combined in the database in the past 30 years.
The fact that Zoster has so many reflects poorly on Zoster.
The fact that Covid-19 vaccines have so many reflects poorly on Pfizer, AstraZenecca, Moderna, Fauci, the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, Biden’s fake administration and our enemies in China.
With your record of dishonesty no one will read your posts.
Nor the idiots that follow you.
Perhaps it’s time to end the “Qanon” thread’s immunity.
Though many there are just looking for honest facts, the leaders of the thread aren’t.
Actually - you referenced blog posts, not data. So, still apologize if your previous dissertations addressed my questions since you didn’t clarify.
However, since you did not answer either question - normalization of VAERS events by number of inoculations, or if the VAERS database is confirmed results from a vaccine (note to others it isn’t) I would infer that you are avoiding the questions.
Take care.