Posted on 04/22/2021 10:25:17 AM PDT by BenLurkin
95% CO2? Not possible according to global warming doctrine, the planet would be molten rock.
—
That’s why they moved it so far from the sun. Erf next.
no fungi.
—
You would know ...
The bad news about Mars is that it’s eight months away if you use a minimum-energy flight plan.
—
Conversely we had built the 1958 Orion, it would have take 3 weeks, but then, we would have done that by 1965 and have gone to Saturn by 1970. By now, the return flight of the colony ship from A Centauri system would be nearing Earth.
I was never great at chemistry and also long out of school, but the equation must be balanced.
For creating CO2 from CO and O2, to get a balanced equation requires:
2CO + O2 → 2CO2
I must just presume you can also go the other way. I am guessing some energy has to be expended to force that.
Oxygen is not stable in a free form state, and will naturally convert to O2. The conversion by MOXIE on the rover produces C+CO+O2 in a high heat reaction.
Mars at one time had more atmosphere, but lacked the liquid oceans and magnetosphere of earth, so most of it was stripped away. Earth is a very special case where the environment was perfect for complex life.
Something is causing out gassing on Mars ...
There is an old Arthur C. Clarke novel - The Sands of Mars - where the problem of oxygen on Mars is solved by lighting one of the moons off as a second sun to get plants to grow.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.