Total conjecture from start to finish
Yup. Very disappointing. Nary a mention of any verbal history of tribes in North America about the site, yet it had to be ‘Native American’ and not something else.
And they critique the ‘trade’ bias. /s But this is the same field of ‘expertise’ which destroyed the stratigraphic evidence at Hueyatlaco by permitting development on the site.
The same field of ‘expertise’ which denies a much older civilization which preceded the accepted narrative (i.e. the ancients behind the ‘megalithic structures’ on multiple continents) and which looks at ancient history through a straw (i.e. Egyptology).
Yeah.