We’ve been on opposite sides regarding Velikovsky. I’m no longer interested in his theories.
But did you ever post a thread of his stuff, perhaps on Worlds In Collision? It’s fascinating, but I consider it refuted.
It hasn't been refuted, just disputed. My main interest is in his "Ages in Chaos" model, in fact, that has always been more interesting to me. My guess is, had that been published first, it would have caught on. Instead, he was vilified by the left (still is) led by Harlow Shapley, and this continued under the leftist imbecile Carl Sagan (but gosh, didn't he look nice on TV).
The conventional pseudochronology is just wrong. Even in this topic, the source article shows some the same kind of illogical CYAs going on to defend the pseudochronology -- a mysterious, unexplained gap between two supposedly time-separated identical developments.
The easiest example to understand is the floor tiles from one of Ramses III's structures has a pattern on the top surfaces that had to be laid just so -- and on the bottom surfaces, Greek letters were painted on (before firing) to show the order they were to be laid down. Ramses III lived during classical Greek times, and that's far from being the only evidence. His guts were still in his canopic jars, and radiocarbon dating was conducted not many years ago, at long last -- and just as Dr V predicted, the gap between pseudochronological age and actual age was more than 700 years.