Posted on 04/12/2021 3:32:12 PM PDT by ransomnote
Thanks, Grampa Dave!
Thanks for the thanks! I hurried to gather and type that stuff in at the end of a long day with much left to do here.
“You really do crack me up.”
******************************
Yeah, don’t you hate that! I have to fight that feeling frequently. ;-)
“Stupid geezers...”
You are so kind.
1986 The Act, very good movie
“I advocate once fully vaccinated lose the mask life life freely. Of course I never believed in masking snd don’t you dare construe this as endorsing a so called vaccine passport.“
Just for clarity, do you support “lose the mask” for those who are not vaccinated? Same question for those who got covid but recovered?
And last question, I am hearing that people who have had covid should still be vaccinated. What do you think of that?
Don't you go gettin' a crush on me too, Harkonnen. I'll only break your heart.
Such hysteria.
I know... and it would be unbearable.😿
Yes, way too much.
Time for America to cowboy up and just say no to the fear vax.
#AndAQtardShallLeadThem
Stay out of trouble, you beyond the treetards.
Keep your hands outside the covers.
You are irretrievably wrong.
Vaccine manufacturers are protected from liability.
HOWEVER, do you deny it is accurate to say that if HCQ and Ivermectin were approved therapeutics for CoVID, then the FDA’s EUA for their fake “vaccine” would go up in smoke, as ransomnote is contending?
If someone is denying me a therapeutic that’s cheaper than a good bottle of wine “because reasons”, then I tend to get suspicious.
Couple that with the lying @ssclown hobbit Fauchnocchio, then I get REAL suspicious.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes. The terms of an EUA require that no other treatment be available, and the situation is an emergency.
Withholding these medications from patients created both an emergency (needless death) and the fake impression that no other drugs were available.
And if this doesn’t happen? Will it be like all those Q predictions about things that ended up never happening?
“The feqrmongers are the ones who got you to clamor for a vax then line up happily like sheep for the jab.”
The scamdemic narrative has always required fear.
How else would one explain the idiots driving their cars alone while wearing a mask, walking outside alone while wearing a mask, playing competitive soccer outside wearing a mask, or husband/wife (who live together) social distancing for their daily evening walk?
Accusing us anti-cv19vaxxers of fear is a kind of sociopathic manipulation/projection on the part of rabid pro-vaxxers. Many of us have written about our reasons to refuse cv19vx. No need to repeat ourselves again, but needless to say, it ain’t about fear. What many of us do fear is not having the right to refuse med treatment including vax.
It doesn't appear they went through the full-size, full-length Phase 1, 2, and 3 trials, right? Or if you have information about the size, duration, and results of those trials, from NIH or CDC or FDA or whichever set of overfed DC bureaucrats runs those things, let me know.
You should know better than to spread fear porn; the chance of death is not uniform among all infected; instead being drastically skewed towards those over 70 with co-morbidities or a history of smoking.
Why then the rush to lock down entire states, forbid any sort of mingling and give *everyone* an mRA jab under Emergency Use Authorization?
Something smells, bad.
You’re misrepresenting what the 95% number meant in context; although I think I saw an explanation on another thread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.