Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster

“...Read the article at the top of this thread. It clearly states that the vax’s were developed from what China supplied the vax companies.

Ergo ipso facto, ‘China Virus’.

You simply must pay attention, Harkonnen, or you will never be right about anything....”
**********************************************************
Nice try at INTENTIONAL OBTUSENESS, Snarkmeister. If you reread my post 10 above you’ll see that I certainly recognize that THE VIRUS IS CHINESE. My post 10 was trying to correct your post 8 meme where you called the vaccines we’re using Chinese vaccines. WRONG - they are not Chinese vaccines, two are American vaccines and one is largely German/American essentially.

The Chinese vaccine? Hell, the Chinese themselves don’t want to get that piece of minimally effective and possibly dangerous Chinese technology.


17 posted on 04/10/2021 10:35:22 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: House Atreides
two are American vaccines and one is largely German/American essentially.

Which couldn't complete the vaccine without the 'sequencing' given to them by China, which the article and I have posted to you, but somehow you fail to understand.

Talk about obtuse.

#ChinaVaccine


18 posted on 04/10/2021 10:53:23 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: House Atreides
Nice try at INTENTIONAL OBTUSENESS, Snarkmeister.

For the record, I question the masculinity and the 'conservative' bona fides of anyone using any form of the derp word 'snark'. Its a left wing, snowflake word.


20 posted on 04/10/2021 11:11:32 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: House Atreides
My post 10 was trying to correct your post 8 meme where you called the vaccines we’re using Chinese vaccines.

Ummm, wrong, that is a Chinese kid getting a Chinese vaccination, in China.

Sinovac's vaccine is a traditional killed virus vaccine, not an mRNA vaccine like Pfizer's and Monderna's.

Sinopharm is developing two vaccines, both killed virus vaccines.

"CoronaVac is a more traditional method [of vaccine] that is successfully used in many well known vaccines like rabies," Associate Prof Luo Dahai of the Nanyang Technological University told the BBC.

"mRNA vaccines are a new type of vaccine and there is [currently] no successful example [of them] being used in the population," Prof Luo adds. [Emphasis added by me, for the terminally dense...]

mRNA vaccine animal tests have shown disturbing results: Incapable of preventing viral infection, binding antibodies can instead trigger paradoxical immune enhancement. What that means is that it looks good until you get the disease, and then it makes the disease far worse than it would have been otherwise. Animal tests of mRNA vaccines were run in 2006 and 2014, when the animals were exposed to the viruses a few months later, they fooking DIED!

Show me the animal tests used before the EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) of the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines, hint: even with a EUA, the manufacturers demanded immunity from prosecution and lawsuits before they'd release their mRNA vaccinations.

58 posted on 04/11/2021 7:57:37 AM PDT by null and void (The media decides what news you can see and NOT SEE. But don't you dare call 'em Not-Sees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson