Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PAR35

So Neanderthals were the sons of God? Or the Neanderthals were beautiful daughters of men? I don’t think so. But that’s just me...
All scientists are not truthful, and all scientific papers written are not truthful.


20 posted on 04/10/2021 9:37:24 AM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing);)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Flaming Conservative
The daughters of men were fair not beautiful.
Genesis 6

1 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,

2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.

3 And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.

4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.<

Use the King James Version.   All of these new age translations are parsed and perfumed hogwash.

27 posted on 04/10/2021 12:57:52 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Flaming Conservative

My theory is certainly not inconsistent with either Scripture or current scientific thought. And recessive Neanderthal genes would explain why the ‘giants’ seem to keep popping up after the flood.


29 posted on 04/10/2021 1:44:55 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson