Well if there is a contradiction then geology is incorrect.
It is a lot of surmising and interpreting anyway.
Plenty of great respected scientists see no conflict. Lots of web sites with wonderful articles reflect this. Icr.org, crev.info, answers in genesis...
Physical Geology you can hold in your hand is impossible to be done in the time frame you propose from your source. There are is surmising or interpreting how long it takes to make slate. Or to create the Hawaiian/Emperor sea mount chain from the one and same static hot spot.
Not saying God did not create it, just making point that he did not do it in the time frame proposed and rumored by Hutton and others before him. But was there a flood? Absolutely... geology proves this to be fact also. Geology can indeed be used to also prove some events from the Bible.
But not a new earth... Fact dictates that it is impossible with the very real evidence at hand. It has grossly misinterpreted out of blind faith and the trust in words of other men.